Difference between revisions of "RAID 6"
From Pulsed Media Wiki
(Created page with "== RAID 6 == '''RAID 6''' is similar to RAID 5 but includes **double distributed parity**, allowing it to tolerate the simultaneous failure of '''two disks'''. It requires...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 12:12, 21 April 2025
Contents
RAID 6
RAID 6 is similar to RAID 5 but includes **double distributed parity**, allowing it to tolerate the simultaneous failure of two disks. It requires a minimum of four disks.
How It Works
RAID 6 stores two independent sets of parity data across all drives, improving redundancy and reliability compared to RAID 5. Like RAID 5, data is striped across all disks.
Disk 1 | Disk 2 | Disk 3 | Disk 4 | Disk 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Data A | Data B | Parity 1 | Data C | Parity 2 |
Parity 1 | Data D | Data E | Parity 2 | Data F |
Advantages
- Tolerates failure of up to **two disks**
- High read performance
- Suitable for large arrays with high availability needs
- Better fault tolerance than RAID 5
Disadvantages
- Slower write performance due to dual parity calculations
- Less usable storage (usable capacity = N-2 disks)
- Even slower rebuilds than RAID 5, with greater risk during rebuilds on large disks
Common Use Cases
- Enterprise-grade storage
- NAS devices requiring high fault tolerance
- Backup servers
- Environments with large capacity SATA disks
Comparison Table
Feature | RAID 5 | RAID 6 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum Disks | 3 | 4 | Tolerates Disk Failures | 1 | 2 | Read Speed | High | High | Write Speed | Moderate | Slower | Storage Efficiency | (N - 1)/N | (N - 2)/N | Suitable For | General use | Critical systems with high redundancy |